Predictive maintenance that stops failures before they stop production

Use intelligent digital twins to detect early signs of equipment degradation, predict failures in advance, and plan maintenance with confidence—without relying on guesswork or calendar-based schedules.

Why maintenance teams are stuck in reactive mode

Many organizations still rely on reactive repairs or time-based preventive maintenance. Traditional approaches focus on individual signals—but predictive maintenance changes the game by understanding how assets behave over time and in context.

The reactive reality

  • Failures discovered too late to avoid downtime
  • Alarms that trigger after damage has already occurred
  • Maintenance performed too early—or too late
  • Overtime, expediting, and spare-part firefighting
  • Critical knowledge locked in a few experts

The predictive advantage

  • Detect degradation before it becomes failure
  • Plan maintenance based on real risk, not guesswork
  • Understand asset behavior across different conditions
  • Prevent repeat failures with intelligent insights
  • Transform maintenance from reactive to strategic

From threshold alarms to real prediction

This solution applies the intelligent digital twin model to a specific operational challenge. For a full explanation of the model itself, see: What is an Intelligent Digital Twin →

With intelligent digital twins, predictive maintenance is not just about monitoring sensor values. It's about modeling how an asset should behave—and detecting when it starts to drift.

In predictive maintenance, the intelligent digital twin is used to:

  • Represent the asset and its operating context
  • Learn normal behavior under different loads and conditions
  • Detect subtle changes that indicate early degradation
  • Project how risk will evolve if nothing changes

This allows teams to move from "something is wrong" to "this asset is likely to fail in X days if we don't act."

A simple, practical flow

1. Connect existing data

Use vibration, temperature, current, pressure, run hours, and maintenance history—no need to start from scratch.

2. Model asset behavior

Create a digital representation of how the asset normally operates under different conditions.

3. Detect anomalies early

Spot deviations that don't trigger traditional alarms but signal emerging problems.

4. Predict failure risk

Estimate how issues will progress over time and which assets are most at risk.

5. Prioritize action

Focus maintenance where it prevents the most downtime, cost, or safety risk.

Where predictive maintenance delivers the most value

Rotating equipment

Motors, pumps, fans, compressors

  • Bearing wear detection
  • Imbalance and misalignment
  • Lubrication issues

Production-critical machines

CNCs, presses, conveyors, packaging lines

  • Performance drift and early fault detection
  • Failure risk tied to production impact

Energy & utility assets

Transformers, substations, generation equipment

  • Asset health monitoring
  • Failure risk under load and weather conditions

Building systems

Chillers, AHUs, pumps, elevators

  • Early detection of system degradation
  • Reduced occupant disruption

Value across maintenance and operations roles

Reliability & maintenance engineers

  • See which assets are trending toward failure
  • Schedule work based on risk, not guesswork
  • Reduce emergency repairs and overtime

Operations & plant managers

  • Understand which issues threaten production
  • Plan around maintenance with fewer surprises
  • Improve schedule stability

Asset & engineering leaders

  • Compare asset health across fleets and sites
  • Identify chronic failure modes
  • Support condition-based maintenance strategies

What teams typically achieve

Results depend on asset mix and maturity, but teams often target:

20–30%
reduction in unplanned downtime
10–20%
reduction in maintenance cost
Days-weeks
earlier detection of failures
  • Fewer emergency call-outs and spare-part crises
  • Better maintenance planning and asset life extension

The biggest gains come from preventing repeat failures—not reacting faster.

Start with one asset class. Prove value. Scale.

1. Start

Choose a high-failure or high-impact asset (e.g., motors, pumps, chillers).

2. Prove

Validate early detection and prediction against real events.

3. Scale

Expand to additional assets, lines, or sites using the same approach.

How the platform supports scale →

Common questions about predictive maintenance

Do we need advanced AI or data science skills?
No. Most predictive maintenance workflows are designed for reliability and maintenance teams, with advanced options available if needed.
What if our data isn't perfect?
That's common. Many programs start with partial or noisy data and improve accuracy over time.
How is this different from condition monitoring?
Condition monitoring shows current state. Predictive maintenance estimates future risk and failure timing.
How quickly can we see value?
Focused use cases often deliver early insight within weeks.
Will this replace our CMMS or EAM?
No. Predictive maintenance typically complements existing maintenance systems by improving decision quality.

Prevent failures instead of reacting to them

Start with one asset that causes the most pain—and build from there.